reconsiDer: TIDBIT
There has been a lot of press about violent street gangs of
late. Special task forces have been set up to "get" these gangsters.
Opportunistic politicians are promising special funding for extra law
enforcement to communities to fight the gangs. Special laws imposing mandatory
penalties for gang-related crimes are being passed. Tough federal laws such as
RICO are being used more and more. The one thing that would cripple these gangs
and make the streets much safer is, of course, the one thing that is
not being talked about. Here, Peter Moscow, a former Baltimore police
officer, explains things to the readership of the Baltimore Sun.
Pubdate: Tue, 03 Aug 2004
Source: Baltimore Sun
(MD)
Author: Peter Moskos
Note: Peter
Moskos, a former Baltimore police officer, is a professor at
John Jay College
of Criminal Justice in New York City.
TAKE THE
VIOLENCE OUT OF THE DRUG TRADE
U.S. ATTORNEY Thomas M.
DiBiagio recently announced the indictment of seven
members of the North
Avenue Boys. He said the bad guys are "finished."
That's great. They
should be in jail. But it won't help the community.
Other drug dealers have
already taken their place. North Avenue is no
better off.
Three years
ago, I was a police officer at the scene on East North Avenue
when 12 people
were shot at an "RIP party" for a North Avenue Boys drug
dealer who had
himself been murdered. I saw the blood mixed with spaghetti.
With a cigar in
hand, I jokingly pointed fellow police officers toward the
buffet spread.
Callous? Perhaps. But I know what anybody who lives or works
in the ghetto
knows: No amount of arrests or federal prosecution will
change the culture of
violence among drug dealers in the ghetto. Surrounded
by poverty and despair,
drug-dealing "gangstas" glamorize a "thug life" and
flaunt money, women and
even time-served for felony convictions.
We've quintupled our prison
population since the war on drugs began in
1970. Last year, Baltimore police
made one arrest for every six people in
the city. In 1999, in the high-crime
Eastern District alone, with 45,000
residents, there were more than 25,000
arrests.
Police can make things better. In a city with high levels of
violent crime,
arrests can be a good thing. But arrests won't change the
culture of drug
dealers. And police can't win the war on drugs. Drug addicts
have to buy
because they're addicted. But drug users destroy mostly
themselves. They
are not destroying the city. Addicts want to be left alone
to enjoy their
high. They rarely shoot anybody.
Drug dealers are
literally killing the city. Almost all drug-related
murders involve one drug
dealer shooting another.
Drug dealers will sell. There's little choice.
There's money to be made.
And drug dealers aren't employable in the
legitimate job market. Nobody
will hire a convicted felon with attitude and
more gold teeth than education.
Drug dealers are doubly bad because they
hurt legitimate businesses.
Dealers want to control the corner. Business
owners call police; vacant
buildings never do. Dealers will break windows,
harass customers and
otherwise make life difficult for the few legitimate
businesses that remain
in the ghetto.
Just as Al Capone's gang killed
other bootleggers, drug dealers are violent
because they have to be. How else
can you run an illegal business with
quick cash profits and no recourse to
police, law or the courts?
Nobody doubts there is a serious drug problem
in the city. The question is
whether drug prohibition helps or
hurts.
Prohibition prevents regulation. We as a society can choose the
way in
which addicts obtain drugs. Most of the violence in Baltimore is
caused not
by drugs alone but rather the criminal way in which drugs are
sold. Drug
prohibition is a bad choice because it leads to armed thugs
hawking their
wares on the corner.
The only way to disarm the drug
culture is to take the profit out of
street-level drug-dealing. Drug
legalization and regulation are the answer.
Why leave the profits to those
who perpetuate violent culture?
Drug manufacturing and distribution
shouldn't be in the hands of the North
Avenue Boys, or any other group of
criminals. As with alcohol, tobacco or
prescription medication, selling drugs
should be the combined
responsibility of doctors, the government and the
legal free market.
In the Netherlands, drugs are decriminalized.
Customers can walk into
certain cafes and legally buy marijuana, hashish and
hallucinogenic
mushrooms. The result? Fewer murders, fewer drug deaths, much
less money
wasted trying to arrest the entire drug-using population, and -
because
education is more effective than prohibition - lower levels of drug
use.
Legalizing drugs would not be a silver bullet. But drug prohibition
must be
recognized as a good intention gone terribly wrong. The war on
drugs
destroys neighborhoods, enriches drug dealers and promotes a
culture
ruining the lives of our cities' youths. Drug prohibition is a
failure.
It's time to try something
else.
__________________________________________________________________________
Distributed
without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in
receiving the
included information for research and educational
purposes.
---
Hope you are enjoying your Tidbits. If you're not a member of
ReconsiDer and
would like to join, please fill out our membership application. And be sure to visit our
website. Click here to
unsubscribe to this mailing list.
_
Please donate to RECONSIDER... we can't continue to bring you the Tidbits, maintain our
website, and all the other things we do to bring a rational drug policy to
America without your help! CLICK
HERE
This site contains copyrighted material
the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy,
scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair
use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US
Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on
this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior
interest in receiving the included information for research and educational
purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site
for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission
from the copyright owner.