I've only included the executive summary here ( the link will take to the entire report) but I think the conclusions of this study are interesting. Studies have always shown drug use rates are about the same for Blacks as for Whites yet the perception is that Blacks use more drugs. White flight to the suburbs was ostensibly, at least in large part, to keep the kids safe from the drug-ridden urban (read "Black") schools to the 'burbs where they'd be safe. According to the authors of this paper "The desks may be newer, the paint may be fresher, and the faces may be whiter, but the students are just as likely to have sex, use controlled substances, and break the law."
Education Working Paper
    No. 4 January 2004

Sex, Drugs, and Delinquency in
Urban and Suburban Public Schools

Jay P. Greene, Ph.D.
Senior Fellow, Manhattan Institute for Policy Research

Greg Forster, Ph.D.
Senior Research Associate, Manhattan Institute for Policy Research


Executive Summary

For the last several decades middle-class families have been fleeing from
the cities to the suburbs, in part because many parents see the suburbs, and
suburban public schools in particular, as refuges from the disorder and
social collapse they see as endemic to America's urban school districts.
Parents believe that suburban public schools provide children with safer,
more orderly, and more wholesome environments than their urban counterparts.

This report finds that those perceptions are unfounded. Using hard data on
high school students from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent
Health, one of the most comprehensive and rigorous studies of the behavior
of American high school students, it finds that suburban public high school
students have sex, drink, smoke, use illegal drugs, and engage in delinquent
behavior as often as urban public high school students. Students also engage
in these behaviors more often than most people realize.

This report finds that:

*    Urban and suburban high schools are virtually identical in terms of
widespread sexual activity. Two thirds of all suburban and urban 12th
graders have had sex; 43% of suburban 12th graders and 39% of urban 12th
graders have had sex with a person with whom they did not have a romantic
relationship.
*    Pregnancy rates are high in both suburban and urban schools, although
they are higher in urban schools; 14% of suburban 12th grade girls and 20%
of urban 12th grade girls have been pregnant.
*    Over 60% of suburban 12th graders have tried cigarette smoking,
compared to 54% of urban 12th graders; 37% of suburban 12th graders have
smoked at least once a day for at least 30 days, compared to 30% of urban
12th graders.
*    Alcohol use followed a similar pattern; 74% of suburban 12th graders
and 71% of urban 12th graders have tried alcohol more than two or three
times; 63% of suburban 12th graders and 57% of urban 12th graders drink
without family members present; 22% of suburban 12th graders and 16% of
urban 12th graders have driven while drunk.
*    About four out of ten 12th graders in both urban and suburban schools
have used illegal drugs; 20% of suburban 12th graders and 13% of urban 12th
graders have driven while high on drugs.
*    Urban and suburban students are about equally likely to engage in other
delinquent behaviors such as fighting and stealing.

The data show that fleeing from the city to the suburbs doesn't produce much
difference in the levels of sex, substance use, and delinquency one finds at
the local public high school. The comforting outward signs of order and
decency in suburban public schools don't seem to be associated with
substantial differences in student behavior.

*********************************************

About the Authors
Jay P. Greene is a Senior Fellow at the Manhattan Institute's Education
Research Office, where he conducts research and writes about education
policy. He has conducted evaluations of school choice and accountability
programs in Florida, Charlotte, Milwaukee, Cleveland, and San Antonio. He
has also recently published research on high school graduation rates,
charter schools, and special education.

His research was cited four times in the Supreme Court's opinions in the
landmark Zelman v. Simmons-Harris case on school vouchers. His articles have
appeared in policy journals, such as The Public Interest, City Journal, and
Education Next, in academic journals, such as The Georgetown Public Policy
Review, Education and Urban Society, and The British Journal of Political
Science, as well as in major newspapers, such as the Wall Street Journal and
the Washington Post.

Greene has been a professor of government at the University of Texas at
Austin and the University of Houston. He received his B.A. in history from
Tufts University in 1988 and his Ph.D. from the Government Department at
Harvard University in 1995. He lives with his wife and three children in
Weston, Florida.

Greg Forster is a Senior Research Associate at the Manhattan Institute's
Education Research Office. He is the co-author of studies evaluating
vouchers, charter schools, high-stakes testing, special education funding,
and other education issues. He has published op-ed articles in the Los
Angeles Times, the Philadelphia Inquirer, the New York Post, and other
newspapers. He received a Ph.D. with Distinction in Political Science from
Yale University in May 2002, and his B.A. from the University of Virginia,
where he double-majored in Political and Social Thought and Rhetoric and
Communications Studies, in 1995.


About Education Working Papers

A working paper is a common way for academic researchers to make the results
of their studies available to others as early as possible. This allows other
academics and the public to benefit from having the research available
without unnecessary delay. Working papers are often submitted to
peer-reviewed academic journals for later publication.

*********************************************


Hope you are enjoying your Tidbits. If you're not a member of and would like to join, please fill out our membership application.  And be sure to visit our website.

Click here to unsubscribe to this mailing list.
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.