reconsiDer: TIDBIT
A ReconsiDer Tidbit sent out a few months ago (Ecstasy
Damages the Brain; or does it? 6/04/2003 ) pointed out the discrepency
between an American study on Ecstasy that showed deaths in 20% of lab animals
given the drug and a German study showing Ecstasy to be essentially harmless. Of
course the American study was publicized in the press here and the German study,
largely ignored. Well, now the truth comes out. The New York Times ran a story
about the U.S. study... it seems they mixed up the chemicals...
NY Times, Sept 6
2003
Report of Ecstasy Drug's Great Risks Is
Retracted
By DONALD G. McNEIL Jr.
leading scientific
journal yesterday retracted a paper it published
last year saying that one
night's typical dose of the drug Ecstasy
might cause permanent brain
damage.
The monkeys and baboons in the study were not injected with
Ecstasy
but with a powerful amphetamine, said the journal, Science
magazine.
The retraction was submitted by the team at Johns Hopkins
University
School of Medicine that did the study.
A medical school
spokesman called the mistake "unfortunate" but said
that Dr. George A.
Ricaurte, the researcher who made it, was "still a
faculty member in good
standing whose research is solid and
respected."
The study, released
last Sept. 27, concluded that a dose of Ecstasy a
partygoer would take in a
single night could lead to symptoms
resembling Parkinson's
disease.
The study was ridiculed at the time by other scientists working
with
the drug, who said the primates must have been injected with huge
overdoses.
Two of the 10 primates died of heat stroke, they pointed
out, and
another two were in such distress that they were not given all the
doses.
If a typical Ecstasy dose killed 20 percent of those who took
it, the
critics said, no one would use it recreationally.
In an
interview yesterday, Dr. Ricaurte said he realized his mistake
when he could
not reproduce his own results by giving the drug to
monkeys orally. He then
realized that two vials his laboratory bought
the same day must have been
mislabeled: one contained Ecstasy, the
other d-methamphetamine.
Dr.
Ricaurte's laboratory has received millions of dollars from the
National
Institute on Drug Abuse, and has produced several studies
concluding that
Ecstasy is dangerous. Other scientists accuse him of
ignoring their studies
showing that typical doses do no permanent
damage.
At the time Dr.
Ricaurte's study was published, it was strongly
defended against those
critics by Dr. Alan I. Leshner, the former
head of the drug abuse institute,
who had just become the chief
executive officer of the American Academy for
the Advancement of
Science, which publishes Science.
Dr. Leshner had
testified before Congress that Ecstasy was dangerous,
and Dr. Ricaurte's
critics accused him of rushing his results into
print because a bill known
as the Anti-Rave Act was before Congress.
The act would punish club owners
who knew that drugs like Ecstasy
were being used at their dance
gatherings.
Dr. Ricaurte yesterday called that accusation
"ludicrous."
His laboratory made "a simple human error," he said. "We're
scientists, not politicians."
Asked why the vials were not checked
first, he answered: "We're not
chemists. We get hundreds of chemicals here.
It's not customary to
check them."
.
Hope you are enjoying your Tidbits. If you're not a member of
ReconsiDer and
would like to join, please fill out our membership application. And be sure to visit our
website.
This site contains copyrighted material
the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy,
scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair
use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US
Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on
this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior
interest in receiving the included information for research and educational
purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site
for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission
from the copyright owner.