America's drug policy at work... create an illegal market for drugs; then spend billions of dollars throwing offenders into prison for participating in it. Then spend more billions housing and feeding them. Then spend still more billions mopping up after the shootings, stabbings, broken homes, destroyed neighborhoods, orphaned children, and other by-products of drug prohibition. Perpetuate this folly as the country's economy is steadily weakening and the deficit is growing to new highs. Then convince the public it's somehow in their interest to have the unsafe streets, higher taxes, and ever more easily available drugs this policy produces. Amazing, what our elected officials are able to sell the public on, isn't it?
Growing prison population is growing problem for cash-strapped states
By Curt Anderson
ASSOCIATED PRESS
10:32 a.m., July 27, 2003

WASHINGTON – America's prison population grew again in 2002 despite a
declining crime rate, costing the federal government and states an
estimated $40 billion a year at a time of rampant budget shortfalls.

The inmate population in 2002 of more than 2.1 million represented a 2.6
percent increase over 2001, according to a report released Sunday by the
Bureau of Justice Statistics. Preliminary FBI statistics showed a 0.2
percent drop in overall crime during the same span.

Experts say mandatory sentences, especially for nonviolent drug
offenders, are a major reason inmate populations have risen for 30
years
. About one of every 143 U.S. residents was in the federal, state
or local custody at year's end.

"The nation needs to break the chains of our addiction to prison, and
find less costly and more effective policies like treatment," said Will
Harrell, executive director of the Texas American Civil Liberties Union.
"We need to break the cycle."

Others say tough sentencing laws, such as the "three strikes" laws that
can put repeat offenders behind bars for life, are a chief reason for
the drop in crime. The Justice Department, for example, this year
ordered Bureau of Prisons officials to stop sending so many white-collar
and nonviolent criminals to halfway houses.

"The prospect of prison, more than any other sanction, is feared by
white-collar criminals and has a powerful deterrent effect," Deputy
Attorney General Larry Thompson said in a memo announcing the change.

Yet the cost of housing, feeding and caring for a prison inmate is
roughly $20,000 per year, or about $40 billion nationwide using 2002
figures, according to The Sentencing Project, a nonprofit organization
that promotes alternatives to prison. Construction costs are about
$100,000 per cell.

Even as these costs keeping climbing, the federal government is tackling
a giant budget deficit and 31 states this year are cutting spending –
most often across all programs – to deal with shortfalls, according to
the National Conference of State Legislatures.

"The prison population and budget figures, taken together, should be
setting off alarm bells in state capitols," said Jason Zeidenberg,
director of policy and research for the Justice Policy Institute, a
nonprofit organization focused on ending reliance on incarceration.

Drug offenders now make up more than half of all federal prisoners. The
federal penal system, which has tough sentencing policies for drug
offenses, is now the nation's largest at more than 151,600 – an increase
of 4.2 percent compared with 2001.

Over the same period, state prison and jail populations grew just 2.4
percent. Prison alternative advocates credit moves in some states to
divert drug offenders to treatment programs and other innovations for
that lower growth rate.

Texas, for example, recently passed a drug treatment alternative law and
saw its prison population remain virtually unchanged from 2001 to 2002.
Ohio, which revised its sentencing and parole guidelines in the late
1990s, had its prison and jail population rise just 0.8 percent last
year compared with 1.9 percent for the Midwest as a whole.

"The way to reduce prison spending is to reduce the number of people in
prison and the number of prisons, like some states across the country
have done," said Rose Braz, director of Critical Resistance, a
California-based group opposed to prison expansion.

At the same time, the Justice Department report found that 17 states
reported increases of at least 5 percent year-to-year in their prison
populations, with Maine's increasing by 11.5 percent and Rhode Island's
rising 8.6 percent. The federal prisons and almost all state corrections
systems are over their capacities, with 71,000 offenders serving their
state or federal sentences in local jails.

Other key points in the report:

–As of last Dec. 31, there were 97,491 women in state or federal
prisons, or about 6.8 percent of all inmates and one in every 1,656
women. There were over 1.3 million male inmates, or about one in 110 men.

–About 10 percent of all black men between 25 and 29 were incarcerated
last year, compared with 1.2 percent of white men and 2.4 percent of
Hispanic men. Overall, the 586,700 black men in prison outnumbered both
the 436,800 white males and 235,000 Hispanic males. Black males account
for about 45 percent of all inmates serving a sentence longer than a year.

–Privately operated prisons held 93,771 inmates, about 5.8 percent of
state prisoners and 12.4 percent of those in federal jurisdictions.

–At year's end 2002, the federal government held 8,748 people at
immigration detention facilities, 2,377 at military jails and 16,206 in
U.S. territorial prisons.

Hope you are enjoying your Tidbits. If you're not a member of and would like to join, please fill out our membership application.  And be sure to visit our website.

Click here to unsubscribe to this mailing list.
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.