reconsiDer:TIDBIT


Conservative columnist Arianna Huffington has not written a column on the drug war in quite some time but it appears she's back...with a vengance. Here she looks at the White House's new ads that link pot smoking youth with terrorists in an attempt to link the failed drug war with the popular war on terrorism.
 
 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------The War on Terror's Newest Target: America's Kids

By Arianna Huffington

Did you know you are harboring terrorists in your furnished basement? To the
terrible trio of Iran, Iraq and North Korea, we've now got to add millions
of American kids. At least that's the cock and bull story the commander in
chief is peddling with a slick new $10 million ad campaign that is one of
the most offensive displays of drug war propaganda ever. And that's saying
something.

The TV spots, which for maximum impact premiered during the Super Bowl,
promote the twisted reasoning that, since drug profits have found their way
into the pockets of terrorists, any young Americans who use drugs are
therefore guilty of aiding and abetting the enemy.

In one particularly odious ad, a series of fresh-faced young people are
shown copping to a host of terrorist atrocities: "I helped kids learn how to
kill;" "I helped murder families in Colombia;" "I helped blow up buildings."

It's a Madison Avenue-slick dramatization of the president's meaningless
assertion that "If you quit drugs, you join the fight against terror in
America."  If that goad pushes a single drug user into newly responsible
behavior, I'll donate my fee for this column to the president's reelection
fund.  But if I win the bet, 10 million of your tax dollars will have been
wasted.

Apparently, in The World According to George W. Bush and his drug czar, John
Walters, the kid smoking a joint at a party is the moral equivalent of Osama
bin Laden or Mohammed Atta.

In the single largest ad buy the federal government has ever made, the White
House spent nearly $3.5 million to get these commercials on the Super
Bowl -- $3.5 million spent not on treatment but on demonizing America's
young people. Our tax dollars at work.

And that's just a minute portion of the $180 million dollars a year the drug
office spends on ads. But they've really upped the ante this time. It's one
thing to drop an egg into a frying pan to demonstrate that drugs are bad for
you, and quite another to link drug users to bloodthirsty murderers.

These ads make it seem like the next logical step in the war on terrorism is
dropping Daisy Cutters on America's high schools and shipping teen-age drug
users off to Guantanamo Bay. With 54 percent of high school seniors
admitting they've used illicit drugs, it's going to get awfully crowded down
in Cuba.

In addition to setting new standards for illogic, the ads are also exercises
in highly selective finger-pointing. We know, for instance, that bin Laden
and al-Qaida used tens of millions of dollars in profits from the diamond
industry to fund their operations. So how come we didn't see a commercial
with a woman, say, a senator's wife, fingering the diamonds on her sparkling
tennis bracelet and admitting: "I helped kids learn how to kill?" And, given
the fact that 15 out of the 19 hijackers, and most of the detainees in Cuba,
came from Saudi Arabia -- where the ruling family, glutted with oil profits,
has coddled extremists for decades -- why no taxpayer-funded ad showing a
soccer mom filling up her SUV and saying: "I helped blow up buildings?"

Simple. Linking diamonds or oil to terror doesn't fit the Bush agenda.
Conflating the war on drugs with the war on terrorism does. These ads are
nothing more than a lame-brained attempt to give the drug war a desperately
needed makeover -- turning it from a dismal, multibillion dollar failure
into a vital front in America's war against the Evil Ones. "Just Say No"
repackaged as "The Battle Hymn of the Republic."  After all, any suggested
front in the War on terrorism can't be questioned without the questioner
being labeled unpatriotic.

You can almost hear the wheels turning inside the heads of the White House
spinmeisters: "The War on Drugs is a loser, but the War on Terror's got
big-time legs. So all we've got to do is blend the two of them together and,
bingo, no more pesky people asking if the $20 billion a year we keep
throwing at the drug war is worth it."

It's hardly a coincidence that just one day after the Super Bowl ads aired,
the White House released a new foreign aid budget that escalates U.S.
military assistance to Colombian troops battling drug traffickers.

At the end of the movie "Traffic," Michael Douglas' dispirited drug czar
crystallizes the madness of the drug war: "If there is a war on drugs, then
many of our family members are the enemy. And I don't know how you wage war
on your own family." Clearly the Bush administration has no such misgivings.

---------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe, or if you have any questions or comments,
please contact me at
arianna@ariannaonline.com

 
 

Hope you are enjoying your Tidbits. If you're not a member of ReconsiDer and would like to join please fill out our membership form.   And be sure to visit our website.


Click here to unsubscribe to this mailing list.