Pubdate: Tue, 27 Nov 2001
Source: San Francisco Examiner
(CA)
Copyright: 2001 San Francisco Examiner
Contact: letters@sfexaminer.comDetails: http://www.mapinc.org/media/389Website:
http://www.examiner.com/Author: Eric Gershon,
City Hall Correspondent
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?115 (Cannabis -
California)
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?194 (Hutchinson,
Asa)SUPES TO FEDS: POT OK IN THE
CITYIf you're sick, say local officials, smoke
pot.
Smoke pot, say the feds, and we'll bust you.
While the war in
Afghanistan absorbs most of the public's attention, this
smaller, yet
volatile, conflict over medicinal cannabis continues to rage
in
California.
San Francisco Supervisor Mark Leno will deliver the
latest lick today when
he requests that local authorities not cooperate with
federal drug
enforcement officials.
"It's important for us to
communicate to (federal authorities), 'Don't waste
your time here,'" Leno
said Monday in an interview. "In the words of our
district attorney, 'Hands
off.' "
Officially and unofficially, San Francisco has supported
marijuana users'
rights since the early 1970s. Five years ago local voters
helped approve --
by 78 percent -- state Proposition 215, "the Compassionate
Use Act of 1996,"
one of the broadest provisions for legal cannabis use in
U.S. history.
Leno's resolution reaffirms The City's and state's
commitment to people who
use marijuana for medical purposes, he
said.
It also pits local government against Big Brother. Federal law
outlaws
marijuana use without exception, and the current Bush administration
has
shown that it intends to enforce the law, even in
California.
"There's a discrepancy between federal law and local law,"
said Richard
Meyer, a spokesman for the San Francisco branch of the Drug
Enforcement
Administration. "I'm sure that Supervisor Leno knows that federal
law
applies."
Last month, DEA chief Asa Hutchinson fulfilled his
pledge during Senate
confirmation hearings to crack down on medical marijuana
clubs, sending
agents to raid a medical cannabis club in West Hollywood on
Oct. 25; they
seized equipment, documents, and hundreds of cannabis
plants.
In September agents stormed the California Medical Research
Center in Cool,
a town in the Sierra foothills, where they also made
seizures.
"Our job is to enforce federal laws," Meyer said. "Even if we
agree with
(Leno), we have a job to do."
The office of Interim U.S.
Attorney for Northern California, David W.
Shapiro, referred all inquiries to
the U.S. Department of Justice in
Washington, D.C., which could not be
reached by press time.
Shapiro's office has not prosecuted criminal
possession of marijuana cases
"in the recent past," however, said spokesman
Matt Jacobs.
A spokesman for the U.S. Attorney in Los Angeles said that
no one has been
charged in connection with October's West Hollywood raid, but
it remains a
possibility.
"(Prop 215) is not as broad as people
think," said U.S. Attorney spokesman
Thom Mrozek.
Leno's resolution,
which would declare San Francisco a "sanctuary" for
medicinal cannabis use,
could put local law enforcement agents in an awkward
spot.
The San
Francisco Police Department, for example, has two investigators
assigned to a
DEA task force -- as it has for 20 years, a police spokesman
said. If the
resolution passes, the task force would violate The
City's
policy.
Spokesman Dewayne Tully did not say how police would
respond should the
resolution pass, and Sgt. Kevin Cashman, head of the
police narcotics unit,
was unavailable for comment.
"The policy right
now is that we work with the DEA," Tully said.
However, Tully also said
that SFPD officers do not book anyone in possession
of cannabis who can prove
they use it for medical purposes. Users of
"hard-core drugs -- heroin, crack"
are the priority, he said.
Local police occasionally arrest and charge
people who cannot prove that
their marijuana is for medical use, he said,
adding, "All of this is on a
case-by-case basis."
San Francisco
cannabis clubs welcome Leno's resolution and some defiantly
ignore the
possibility of DEA raids, which are always unannounced.
"I'm not sure
that I should allow that to enter into my reality," said
Richard Evans of San
Francisco Patients and Caregivers. "I'm not aware of
them or what their
powers are. You can put people in jail, but you cannot
change the fact that
(voters approved) Prop 215."
Leno's resolution is all but certain to
pass. Eight of eleven supervisors
are
co-sponsors.
__________________________________________________________________________